Message13777

Author rader
Recipients ajit, dan, dasu, hashimoto, rader, radtke, wcmaier
Date 2008.03.10 15:29
Content
Yea, the screen locking program doesn't know about AFS tokens,
and we really don't have the resources to add that functionality.

Please run "klog" after you unlock.

steve
--

 > ---- Original Message ----
 > From: Akikazu Hashimoto via UW-HEP Help System <help@hep.wisc.edu>
 > 
 > Thank you for the input, Sridhara,
 > 
 > I do think the machine gets locked automatically when it is idle, but 
 > the typing of the password does not seem to reactivate the token. 
 > Coupling the two would be a viable solution as far as I am concerned.
 > 
 > -aki
 > 
 > Sridhara Dasu wrote:
 > > Dear Aki,
 > >
 > > The problem is not that computers are unable to handle the situation.
 > > It is just that humans have declared that tokens should expire on
 > > a regular basis.  The only way to renew the token is to authenticate
 > > by typing the password again.  The idea is that a person who snoops
 > > into your office during your long absence can steal some of your
 > > privileges.  To be safe one should lock/unlock every time one leaves
 > > the machine!  I think making tokens of 24 hours validity is a
 > > compromise that was imposed on us.  I think making the tokens last
 > > any longer is not very productive.  My suggestion is to lock the
 > > screen automatically, and make the screen unlocking, which requires
 > > typing in password, automatically acquire a token.
 > >
 > > Sridhara
 > >
 > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
 > > Prof. Sridhara Rao Dasu                         Department of Physics
 > > dasu@hep.wisc.edu                             University of Wisconsin
 > > http://www.hep.wisc.edu/~dasu                    4289 Chamberlin Hall
 > > 608-262-3678 ( Office )                        1150 University Avenue
 > > 408-829-6625 (Wireless)                        Madison, WI 53706, USA
 > >
 > >
 > > On Mar 10, 2008, at 11:17 AM, Akikazu Hashimoto via UW-HEP Help System 
 > > wrote:
 > >
 > >>
 > >> Thanks for the reply.
 > >>
 > >> I consider mail client as a program which runs in the background. I am
 > >> not engaged in it actively all the time, but respond to alerts. Since
 > >> situations of being away from the desk/office happens quite
 > >> intermittently in a typical day, paying attention to closing the
 > >> application every time (or paying attention to when the AFS token are
 > >> likely to expire) seems like unnecessary user involvement on something
 > >> which computers are otherwise very good at handling.
 > >>
 > >> -aki
 > >>
 > >> ----------
 > >> status: resolved -> chatting
 > >>
 > >> ______________________________________
 > >> UW-HEP Help System <help@hep.wisc.edu>
 > >> <https://help.hep.wisc.edu/issue5149>
 > >> ______________________________________
 > >
 > 
 > ______________________________________
 > UW-HEP Help System <help@hep.wisc.edu>
 > <https://help.hep.wisc.edu/issue5149>
 > ______________________________________
History
Date User Action Args
2008-03-10 15:29:47radersetrecipients: + rader, wcmaier, dan, dasu, ajit, hashimoto, radtke
2008-03-10 15:29:47raderlinkissue5149 messages
2008-03-10 15:29:46radercreate